Calatrava's Transit Hub Roof Gets Stuck
|
Retractable roofs have been architects' idée fixe for decades. Moshe Safdie once wrote up an idea for entire neighborhoods shielded by such roofs during the harsh season and open to the elements when it's nice outside. The path to these dreams' realization has been fraught with difficulties [1], from budget overruns to full-blown engineering disasters like Montreal's Olympic Stadium (after a decade of efforts to fix it, the city finally gave up and installed a fixed roof in its place. It won't be moving any time soon). Nevertheless, projects like that pop up again and again. And so do the difficulties. The latest example is Santiago Calatrava's project for the Lower Manhattan Transportation Hub. Among the project's many innovative features was a retractable roof. But will there be one in the final implementation? * * *
The project announcement published by AIArchitect in 2004 read [2]: Calatrava's plans for the $2 billion project call for an open-air design to link the ferries, trains, commuter trains, and subway lines that converge at the World Trade Center site.
Despite repeated assurances from Port Authority (most recently in April) that the retractable roof feature is non-negotiable, it now looks like they're ready to nix it from the plan, permanently fixing it in a half-open state. A recent Port Authority press release [4] explained the decision: Speaking at a breakfast meeting of the Downtown Alliance Downtown Lower Manhattan Association, [Port Authority's Executive Director,] Mr. Ward presented the [candid and transparent] assessment, which for the first time identified and detailed the key roadblocks to moving the project forward faster and more cost effectively.While the architect has been trying to put a brave face it (a NYTimes article quoted Calatrava as saying that the revision is simply "the latest example of many changes we have recommended” to save time and money “while preserving the integrity of the original design.”), it is clear that without the kinetic feature the project may not be as groundbreaking as it was slated to be. And the rumor is, things can get tougher still - some guess that many of the interior features that had to do with getting natural light inside the building may be revised (down) as well. We'll be sure follow the developments.
Links and Sources
See it on the MapComments & Reactionsblog comments powered by DisqusShare This Article |
Advertisement
|
Very unlikely. But let's start from the beginning.
Impressive. But that was 2004.
Now, let's fast forward to 2008. The NY/NJ Port Authority is
struggling to keep the soaring costs of the project under $2.5 billion (some
estimate the real cost of the project could now reach $3.4 billion). And it
looks that increasingly that means making cuts.
Drastic ones.